UK Revenge Porn Now Punishable By Two Years

The revenge porn law, which has now come in effect in the United Kingdom, will protect men, women and possibly children whose explicit sexual content had spread over the internet without their authorisation. The revenge porn law will carry a penalty of up to two years imprisonment.

Officially, the law describes the crime as “posting private, sexual images of someone without consent and with the intent to cause distress.”

However, this is truly not enough to protect those whose lives could possibly be destroyed by revenge pornography.

About 146 cases gathered from nine police stations in England and Wales indicate that most of the cases involved women and children as young as 14-years-old. 

Suspects often send the sexually-explicit content online through email and social networks.

The crime is not limited to posting images

The Criminal Justice and Court Act, which enacted the law today, increases the allowable sentence for “trolling” online. An abusive message with the clear “intent to cause distress or anxiety” could earn up to two years of imprisonment as well.

Revenge Porn Is Now Illegal in England and Wales

Following atrocious cases of women “virtually raped” and harassed by explicit photographs of themselves with their ex-lovers, the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill will receive Royal Assent and become law. Offenders will face up to two years in jail.

Images and videos sent through social networks including Facebook and Twitter, and even those sent through MMS or SMS are also considered.

Scotland and Northern Ireland are considering to implement similar laws. The Scottish Government also announced its plans to consult on making revenge porn a offense with a category of its own.

In the UK alone, there are 30 revenge porn websites publishing thousands of individuals’ explicit photographs without their consent. Meanwhile, successfully removing one’s media from one revenge porn website isn’t enough as the media makes its way to other websites.

According to England and Wales Police Forces, 149 allegations of revenge porn had been made from January 2012 to July 2014. Six of these cases were met with police action.

According to Former Culture Secretary Maria Miller:

"By putting this in place the government has given young women the opportunity to protect themselves from their lives being blighted.

"When you speak to the victims of these crimes, many say that it feels as if you've been virtually raped.

"You can't underestimate the impact of having an image distributed to many people around the world."

Obama Proposes Stricter Privacy Laws For US

US President Barack Obama on Monday proposed that the country strengthen its laws against identity theft and hacking. He argues that with tech advances come privacy risks for many citizens.

He said that tech services should issue a notification when consumer information is hacked and efforts must be realised to protect student’s private data.

Obama said that the recent hack on Sony Pictures Entertainment is an example of a tech problem that costs billions of dollars. With virtually many personal information in the country available online, lives could turn upside down in an instant.

He argued that the age of digital technology innovation had created vast amounts of vulnerabilities for US citizens. 

"This is a direct threat to the economic security of American families and we've got to stop it," Obama said in a speech at the Federal Trade Commission. "If we're going to be connected, we need to be protected."

Just as Obama finished speaking, the Twitter and YouTube accounts for U.S. Central Command were taken over by hackers who claimed to be working on behalf of Islamic State militants.

Meanwhile new tech laws have already been implemented by the start of this year. Check them in this list.

Google’s Case in the United Kingdom Could Clarify Country’s Privacy Laws

The Information Commissioner’s Office had intervened between Google and a group of UK Internet users because of its interests to clarify the jurisdiction of the country’s privacy laws.

The UK Internet users allege that Google used cookies to track their browsing activity using Apple’s Safari browser in 2011 and 2012 against their wishes. The case has been ongoing since 2013. This follows an earlier failed lawsuit against Google in the United States where the allegations could not be proved because the victims do not have evidence they were harmed.

However, the US FTC had fined google with $22.5 million for secretly bypassing Safari settings to 

collect information from unwilling users.

The UK High Court initially rejected the argument of the UK web users, which prompted the group to move their case into the United States. At this point, Google went to the Court of Appeal to try to overturn the ruling. This is when UK’s ICO intervened by submitting written evidence to the court.

According to an ICO Spokesman, it is interested in the case because it clarifies the issues about the jurisdiction of the law to serving civil claims against foreign companies. The ICO submitted written evidence to provide classes of personal data under the UK Data Protection act and when personal data processing is taking place.

Source

Should Northern Ireland Still Make Changes to Its Abortion Law?

Northern Ireland remains mum on the issue regarding abortion and still has a ban in place for the controversial activity. However, should they consider foetuses with possible birth defects that could shorten its lifespan for abortion?

Let’s get things straight. The UK legislation protects people from pain and suffering. Even our justice systems encourage people to report pain and suffering as clauses to gain recompense for damages. If children are made to suffer because of their birth defects by being alive, shouldn’t it count as child abuse and pain and suffering charges?

According to Justice Minister David Ford “I believe we owe it to people who have highlighted the case in the media and others who have suffered in silence that we address those issues which have caused significant concern.”

Sarah Ewart made her case public when she said she had to travel to London to have her child aborted because the baby was diagnosed with anecephaly, a severe brain anomaly that lowered the survival rate of her child even if it should survive after childbirth.

Having an abortion law in Northern Ireland would be helpful especially with the proper regulation of the industry and the proper legalities in place. It also lowers costs for those who intend to have an abortion.

Currently, North Ireland only allows mothers to have an abortion if the child is putting the mother’s life in grave danger. I don’t think this would be enough.