Thursday, 24 November 2016

Things To Remember About UK's Child Seat Law For 2016

A third of UK's parents had fitted their children's car seats erroneously according to data by Insurer Sheila's Wheels. Data suggests that one out of 10 of these instalments may be dangerous as they can unhinge and injure children.



UK and EU law states only EU-approved seats used in the United Kingdom. If the parents could not follow proper seating instalment and placement for children their insurer may render them ineligible to claim for insurance. Of course, the primary concern is the safety of children.

Here are a few pointers to make sure you comply with 2016's new car seat laws for children.

•             Kids under 12 years old must use car seats.
•             Children under 135cm tall must use car seats.
•             Kids under 150cm still recommended under laws in Ireland, Germany and France.

Children are to travel in rear-facing seats designed for toddlers and infants until they are at least 15 months old. Parents may need a larger rear-facing seat when the baby outgrows their rear-facing seat.

To fit the seat correctly, the Scottish Sun has a few steps to help you.


Children can only travel legally without a car seat if they're travelling in a public vehicle such as a taxi, cab or minivan. But they could only sit at the back of the car. In a minibus or coach, young kids are to sit in the back. Parents with more than three children are also legally entitled to seat their children where they can most fit.

Wednesday, 19 October 2016

UK Threatened With Legal Action Over Children's Conditions in Calais Camps








Concerned UK citizens threaten to lodge a claim against the UK government for avoiding 
intervention in the case of 30 children stranded in the desolate French camp.



Citizens UK, a charity working with the Home Office on the current Calais operation, the current programme of the UK government in the territory is slow and one-dimensional.

They threaten to launch legal actions against the government unless it intervenes in the case of 30 of the most vulnerable children stranded in the area.

The charity claimed the Home Office programme has ignored a group of over 500 unaccompanied 
children about eight to 15 years old most of them females due to their lack of relatives in the United Kingdom.

“The government has still not set up a system to assess their best interests and transfer these children, who include 38 girls from the Calais camp. Zero children have been transferred to date under the amendment’s terms,” the charity said in a statement.

George Gabriel, community organiser with Citizens UK, said: “There are over 1,200 children in the middle of a muddy, freezing field surrounded by 10,000 adults they do not know. The idea that as a country we cannot successfully reunite the small number eligible with their families is ridiculous.

“The real problem here is that the provisions introduced specifically to protect the very youngest and most vulnerable children under the Dubs amendment have never been acted on.”

Thursday, 15 September 2016

UK Called To Stop Arms Sales To Saudi Over Human Rights Violations

A House of Commons Business and International Development Committees report indicate that the sale of UK's arms to Saudi Arabia should halt following the latter's involvement in Yemen.



The Committee said it had received evidence of "clear violations" of international humanitarian law (IHL). About 47 civilians including 21 women and 15 children were killed in Saudi Arabian 
skirmishes using UK weaponry. The report also included injuries to 58 more individuals after a house hosting a wedding party was hit by Saudi Arabian aircraft ammunition.

MPs are split on the issue. According to the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee's rival report, the government must block exports if the UK courts say the weapon sales are unlawful.

The Saudi Arabian Air Force including other allies of the US-led coalition have also struck other neutral parties in Syria.

Medicins Sans Frontieres accused the coalition of war crimes after attacking several of their volunteer hospitals in the area that killed 11 the previous month.

According to FAC Conservative Chairman Crispin Blunt the report was one-sided. He had walked 
out of a private meeting between the House of Commons Committees on Arms Export Controls (CAEC) to avoid a vote from being taken on the draft report.


The UK Defence Committee did not comment whether they will publish their own report on the matter.

Friday, 12 August 2016

Legal Challenge Against Brexit Involves Ulster Volunteer Force Victims

Raymond McCord did not receive the news of Brexit quite well, I believe.



Currently, Mr McCord is seeking a judicial review that would allow him to challenge the decision over Brexit as it would impact the benefits he receives from the European Union.

Mr McCord's son Raymond Jr was beaten to death by the Ulster Volunteer Force in 1997 while they lived in Belfast. The 'Troubles' had many human rights victims that the EU supports under a collective ruling.

The support from the EU could be altered once the United Kingdom leaves the European Union officially in a few years.

According to his lawyer:

"As a victim of the most recent conflict in Northern Ireland, Mr McCord is very concerned about the profoundly damaging effect that a unilateral withdrawal of the UK from the EU will have upon the ongoing relative stability in Northern Ireland."

His legal team claim it would be unlawful to begin the formal process of the UK leaving the EU without a parliamentary vote.

They also claim it could undermine the UK's treaty obligations under the 1998 Good Friday Agreement and the peace process.

It is also one of the first types of challenge to come out from Northern Ireland in light of Brexit. 

Thursday, 14 July 2016

Theresa May On Environment, Surveillance and Drugs

As David Cameron steps down, a post-Brexit Prime Minister for the Tories accepts the torch.
To fulfil the last three years of Tories as big bosses, former Home Secretary Theresa May takes the keys to Number 10.



To clarify her controversial stances regarding the environment, surveillance and drugs, Wired's Matt Burgess analyses the possible future of Britain under her command.

On surveillance, Mrs May had under-success in changing surveillance methods available to police forces, the GCHQ, and the MI5.

She plans to publish the draft of the new Investigatory Powers Bill, which was published in November 2015. According to Mrs May, the draft published is different from the Communications Bill of 2012, which only added a few minor clauses without actually fixing the issue of surveillance.

This would mean that communication companies would store information about their consumers and have legal powers to hack mobile phones and other gadgets without user permission.

On the environment, Mr Burgess speculates that Mrs May might not be the best candidate to reduce the pollution and balding forestry in the country.

Mr Burgess' research with information from TheyWorkForYou, Mrs May had voted against measures that would have stopped climate changed. She in fact had voted to sell England's state-owned forests for better economic measure.


On drugs, the new Prime Minister had oversee the Psychoactive Substances Bill during her time as Home Secretary. This allows authorities to seize and destroy any psychoactive substances and obtain a warrant to search the homes of suspects possessing or creating them.

Sunday, 12 June 2016

Canadian Government to Legalise Marijuana Under Two Conditions

Canadian President Justin Trudeau seeks to legalise marijuana however it takes. Obviously, he's using regulation versus banning and the procurement of marijuana in the black market. During an economic conference in Canada last Wednesday, he said:

"Look, our approach on legalising marijuana is not about creating a boutique industry or bringing in tax revenue. It's actually based on two very simple principles:

The first one is, young people have easier access to cannabis now in Canada more than they do in just about any other country in the world. Of 29 different countries studied by the UN, Canada was number one in terms of underage access to marijuana.

"And whatever you may think of studies about marijuana and cannabis being less harmful than alcohol or even cigarettes, it is still bad for the developing brain and we need to make sure it's harder for underage Canadians to access marijuana.

"The other piece of it is there are billions upon billions of dollars flowing into the pockets of organised crime, street-gangs and gun-runners due to the illicit marijuana trade. If we can get them to a more regulated fashion we can reduce the amount of criminal activity profiting from these and its offshoots into other criminal activities."

According to Trudeau, Canada "could be to Cannabis as France is to wine", encouraging the country's top entrepreneurs and innovators to think of ways to proliferate the about-to-boom Cannabis trade in the country.


Trudeau said his primary concern is the safety of children often dragged into the world of Cannabis and its darker areas.

Monday, 16 May 2016

Petition For Change In Women's Dress Code Receives 120,000 Signatures

A London PwC female employee who refused to wear heels going to work had started a petition that has so far earned 120,000 signatures from the rest of the United Kingdom.
Worldwide, the petition gained support after it had made headlines.

Nicola Thorpe, a PwC former clerk, had started the petition after she was "made fun of" of her superiors, who had her go home without pay until she changed her outfit.

"It's still legal in the UK for a company to require female members of staff to wear high heels at work against their will," the petition states. "Dress code laws should be changed so that women have the option to wear flat formal shoes at work, if they wish. Current formal work dress codes are outdated and sexist."

Thorpe said employers still have the right to impose different dress codes for men and women. However, this is only fair when the dress code doesn't favour one of the sexes," according to Thorp.

Studies have shown repeatedly the effects of wearing high-heels for more than eight hours, which are often required of these women. Some studies have highlighted that females who wear high heels more than one hour and 30 minutes start to experience excruciating pain.